Just a note

Just a note. When Ken Starr ceased his investigation into Pres Clinton finding no evidence of any wrongdoing I Fedexed my Clinton file (about an inch thick) to him. Ken Starr reopened the Clinton investigation and Clinton was subsequently impeached on the charges stemming from Ken Starr's reopened investigation. Unfortunately, I do not believe in theories per se, I prefer to deal with facts, but I follow them wherever they may lead. Halliburton has recently received 400 million to build detention camps in the US. The book "Fortunate Son" reveals details about Bush' drugging and boozing days that should make people tremble. http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1887128751/ref=sib_dp_pt/102-8348965-0727325#reader-link
More details of my personal political agenda can be discerned at
http://pjpoliticsandpolicy.blogspot.com
My military and foreign policy commentaries may be found at
http://starfleet1.tripod.com/maf/mmmaxims.html
As a veteran, I am proud to have served this country, but recognize the limits of force especially when running hand-in-hand with hidden political agendas (from either side) with religious overtones (the most danegerous of all alliances).
I projected a Bush win twice with Bush winning both elections in a disputed contest - if my assessment of history was accurate, with the second dispute probably occuring in Ohio.
David Ickes' research parallels my own but is much more detailed and comprehensive than mine, I recommend researching his website for details.
http://www.davidicke.com/content/blogcategory/30/48/
It was from a posting here in May of 2000 that I first heard about a projected airliner attack against US targets of civil importance while "true" targets (militarily significant or true-destruction-capable targets - targets that would kill many thousands or even millions) would be avoided. A couple of months later in a newspaper published in India, I was reading about how the recently elected US Administration (George Bush) would have to convince the American people to initiate a war against Iraq in order to prevent the oilfields from falling under Chinese control. I can see how controlling the oilfields helps the US maintain the balance of power over China, but am uncertain if the attack into Iraq was initiated for this reason. The Afghanistan oil pipeline was planned literally decades ago, originally by the British, then the Soviets and then American/Saudi oil interests:
http://www.rense.com/general19/oil.htm
above from 1997
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1023-10.htm
above from 2001
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2017044.stm
above from 2002
Cheney's ties with Halliburton are well-known even while he is in office - which is illegal.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/26/politics/main575356.shtml
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/040216fa_fact?040216fa_fact
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0403-10.htm
Conspiracy theories? Hogwash. How about conspiracy facts? I require independent confirmation for all my data and maintain numerous sources whose credentials are outstanding.
In 1985 I determined from open source media and my own collection of sources that a secret group was operating out of the White House basement. And, using the CIA as cover, was growing drugs in Iran to be sold to the public to purchase arms and training for the Contra's in Nicaragua. Training was from Israeli commando's while arms were transhipped through South Africa. Israel and Saudi Arabia? Isn't that a juxtaposition? This lead me into further research which I continue to this day. My data is unassailable. I deal only with the truth. Being human, I occasionally make mistakes and I am always prepared to recant errors or omissions.
Want to be scared?
http://www.trance-formation.org/
************************************
From a post on http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/09/28679.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage